Texas A&M
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
357 |
Isaac Spencer |
SR |
32:35 |
481 |
Ryan Miller |
SR |
32:49 |
523 |
Austin Wells |
SO |
32:54 |
839 |
Cameron Villarreal |
SO |
33:24 |
939 |
Austin Geerts |
SR |
33:33 |
995 |
Ryan Teel |
SO |
33:38 |
1,052 |
Christian Farris |
FR |
33:43 |
1,574 |
Elliott Farris |
SO |
34:24 |
1,584 |
Colin Slattery |
SR |
34:25 |
1,651 |
Colin Stoeber |
SO |
34:30 |
2,718 |
Julian Castellano |
FR |
36:34 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
38.9% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Isaac Spencer |
Ryan Miller |
Austin Wells |
Cameron Villarreal |
Austin Geerts |
Ryan Teel |
Christian Farris |
Elliott Farris |
Colin Slattery |
Colin Stoeber |
Julian Castellano |
Roy Griak Invitational |
09/27 |
931 |
31:57 |
32:56 |
32:23 |
|
33:50 |
34:03 |
34:10 |
33:29 |
33:58 |
34:25 |
36:05 |
HBU Invitational |
10/10 |
1272 |
|
|
|
|
|
33:46 |
34:06 |
|
|
34:21 |
37:32 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/17 |
1057 |
32:37 |
32:52 |
33:16 |
33:26 |
33:28 |
|
|
34:28 |
35:28 |
|
|
Wisconsin adidas Invitational - B |
10/17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33:20 |
33:39 |
|
|
34:36 |
|
SEC Championships |
10/31 |
1109 |
33:20 |
32:56 |
33:26 |
33:24 |
33:28 |
33:42 |
33:46 |
35:21 |
34:14 |
|
|
South Region Championships |
11/14 |
983 |
32:34 |
32:34 |
32:35 |
33:24 |
33:34 |
33:43 |
33:20 |
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.2% |
30.7 |
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
Region Championship |
100% |
5.8 |
177 |
|
0.2 |
2.3 |
13.4 |
23.0 |
31.9 |
20.6 |
6.6 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Isaac Spencer |
12.7% |
185.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Miller |
1.5% |
209.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin Wells |
0.7% |
208.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cameron Villarreal |
0.2% |
234.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin Geerts |
0.2% |
238.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Teel |
0.2% |
239.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Farris |
0.2% |
247.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Isaac Spencer |
17.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
3.2 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
4.9 |
4.7 |
5.3 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
Ryan Miller |
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
Austin Wells |
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
Cameron Villarreal |
48.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
Austin Geerts |
54.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Ryan Teel |
59.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Farris |
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.2% |
100.0% |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
2 |
3 |
2.3% |
0.9% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
13.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
23.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
31.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
20.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
6.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
1.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.2% |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.8 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Texas-Arlington |
0.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |